CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) RESOURCE CENTER Read More

CA AB 1248

Title: Local redistricting: independent redistricting commissions.
Author: Benjamin J. Allen

Summary
AB 1248, Bryan. Local redistricting: independent redistricting commissions. Existing law generally requires county boards of supervisors, city councils, and the governing boards of school districts, community college districts, and other special districts, if those bodies are elected using district-based elections, to adopt new boundaries for the districts following each federal decennial census. Notwithstanding that requirement, existing law authorizes a local jurisdiction other than a charter city to establish an independent redistricting commission to adopt new boundaries for the local jurisdiction’s districts.This bill would require a county, general law city, charter city, or charter city and county that contains over 300,000 residents, and a school district or community college district that contains over 500,000 residents, to establish an independent redistricting commission to adopt district boundaries after each federal decennial census. The bill would require a county, general law city, charter city, or charter city or county with over 300,000 residents, and a school district or community college district with over 500,000 residents, that does not enact an ordinance, resolution, or charter amendment establishing an independent redistricting commission by January 1, 2030, and January 1 of every subsequent year ending in 0, to establish a 14-member independent redistricting commission according to specified procedures, including procedures for the random selection of the members of the commission from among applicants meeting certain qualifications. By requiring certain local jurisdictions to establish independent redistricting commissions to adopt district boundaries, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.The bill would prohibit a member of an independent redistricting commission from communicating with any individual or organization regarding redistricting matters, except as provided. The bill would require the State Auditor to provide the contact information of any applicant to serve on the Citizens Redistricting Commission, which is responsible for adjusting the boundary lines of the congressional, legislative, and State Board of Equalization districts, to any city or county that has established an independent or hybrid redistricting commission, provided that the applicant has consented to share this information and the city or county has requested to receive this information, and to inform those applicants of opportunities to serve on an independent or hybrid redistricting commission. The bill would require the State Auditor to establish a database and create and advertise a process for this exchange of information. Under existing law, independent redistricting commissions have been established for the Counties of Los Angeles, San Diego, Riverside, Fresno, and Kern.The bill would exempt the Counties of Los Angeles, San Diego, Riverside, Fresno, and Kern from the bill’s provisions requiring a county with over 300,000 residents to establish an independent redistricting commission, unless the existing law provisions establishing independent redistricting commissions for those counties are repealed or invalidated. The bill also would exempt a charter city with a population of at least 2,500,000 people from the bill’s provisions if specified conditions are met, including if both this bill and Senate Bill 52 are enacted and if the city complies with certain provisions in Senate Bill 52 that require such cities to establish independent redistricting commissions.This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 23003 of the Elections Code proposed by Assembly Bill 764 to be operative only if this bill and Assembly Bill 764 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.The California Constitution requires the

Status
Vetoed by Governor.

Bill Documents
CA AB 1248 - 09/18/23 - Enrolled
09/18/23 - CA AB 1248 (09/18/23 - Enrolled)


CA AB 1248 - 09/07/23 - Amended Senate
09/07/23 - CA AB 1248 (09/07/23 - Amended Senate)

CA AB 1248 - 09/01/23 - Amended Senate
09/01/23 - CA AB 1248 (09/01/23 - Amended Senate)

CA AB 1248 - 08/14/23 - Amended Senate
08/14/23 - CA AB 1248 (08/14/23 - Amended Senate)

CA AB 1248 - 06/13/23 - Amended Senate
06/13/23 - CA AB 1248 (06/13/23 - Amended Senate)

CA AB 1248 - 05/18/23 - Amended Assembly
05/18/23 - CA AB 1248 (05/18/23 - Amended Assembly)

CA AB 1248 - 02/16/23 - Introduced
02/16/23 - CA AB 1248 (02/16/23 - Introduced)

Add To Favorites

Author Details


  • Ben Allen - D
    Senator - State Senate - CA

    Contact this Senator
    Visit their Website

    Contact Tips

    Capital Address:
    1021 O Street, Suite 6610
    Sacramento, CA 95814-4900
    9166514024

    District Address:
    111 Penn Street, Suite 101
    El Segundo, CA 90278 3279
    Phone: 3104148190